ACMOC
Login
ACMOC
conversion to hydraulic blade on my old 3T

conversion to hydraulic blade on my old 3T

Showing 1 to 10 of 30 results
1
mrsmackpaul
Topic Author
Offline
Send a private message to mrsmackpaul
Posts: 1,456
Thank you received: 0
gudday all wondering about some info on converting my old 3T to hydraulic was all keen to bring in from anywhere around the world a nose cone ect even to stage I tracked one down in Canada and then I had a revelation 657bruce bunged up some pictures of his 3T and a conversion that was done to it and I still had to wait for seiscat to comment before I made the connection even after Bruce had responded to my post about his conversion I'm a bit slow on the uptake at times.
Anyway back to my questions the only problem I have with Bruces conversion is it is not live drive ie off the motor I think I might have managed to track down a hard nose and hydraulic unit for a 17 A but I was wondering if this pump would be compatible with the D7 E rams as when I look in my parts book for the hydraulic for these there appears to be no relief valve on the pump but on the rams them selves if so do the D7 E rams have the same type of set up??? and are the 17A hydraulic units low pressure as they have large diameter rams ? if I was to put a pump off something else on how much oil does it need to pump for these D7 E rams to work effectivly and what sought of pressure will the pump need to be ??? any help much appreciated
thanks in advance for any help seeya

Paul
Attachment
Attachment
Please log in or create an account to join the conversation.
Tue, Feb 4, 2014 4:36 AM
Ray54
Offline
Member
Send a private message to Ray54
Posts: 2,062
Thank you received: 43
With the us what is laying around thinking, I had a 20 gal/min 2000psi pump on a 9u D6 with a Cat hydraulic hard nose set up.I never put a psi gauge on it so I don't know were the by pass was set at,but never had any problems with damaging anything with to much pressure.But the low volume made it very hard to get anything done as the blade was very very very slow.Using the tractor to farm with it was all right for pulled equipment so was on the tractor several years.Has been up graded to a 60 gallon a minute pump and it makes the dozer a joy to run.Would not consider any thing less than 50 gallon a minute pump to run the older style hydraulic rams.I am not a big fan of the Cat style hydraulic set up with the value in the tank but dose do away with some pluming.Good luck sorting out how you want to plum it.
Ray
Please log in or create an account to join the conversation.
Tue, Feb 4, 2014 9:46 PM
seiscat
Offline
Send a private message to seiscat
Posts: 1,319
Thank you received: 1
Hi Paul,
Here's some info that I hope helps. First of all Cat introduced the D7E in 1963. The D7E was a larger machine than the old D7. The old D7 3T&17A size machine was replaced by the new larger D6C. The old D6 9U size machine was replaced by the new D5, a designation which had not been used in years. Madness you say? Well, see the Cat machine designations of the recent past!
The D7E parts will not work on your machine. The photos of the hard- nose and rams on 657bruce's machine seem to be from a D6C. The D6C used internal relief valves on the rams. From the photos it looks like 657bruce used a Bee Gee external pump. Those old Bee Gee's were fairly plentiful and parts are still available. The Bee Gee would be a easy fix but I do not know how well it performs as a blade control. I do not know why 657bruce did not respond to your post, maybe try a private message? Let me know.
The 17A D7 used a larger hyd. tank than the 3T D7 and uses a "pooched-out" lower grill.
Please log in or create an account to join the conversation.
Tue, Feb 4, 2014 10:11 PM
mrsmackpaul
Topic Author
Offline
Send a private message to mrsmackpaul
Posts: 1,456
Thank you received: 0
Reply to seiscat:
Hi Paul,
Here's some info that I hope helps. First of all Cat introduced the D7E in 1963. The D7E was a larger machine than the old D7. The old D7 3T&17A size machine was replaced by the new larger D6C. The old D6 9U size machine was replaced by the new D5, a designation which had not been used in years. Madness you say? Well, see the Cat machine designations of the recent past!
The D7E parts will not work on your machine. The photos of the hard- nose and rams on 657bruce's machine seem to be from a D6C. The D6C used internal relief valves on the rams. From the photos it looks like 657bruce used a Bee Gee external pump. Those old Bee Gee's were fairly plentiful and parts are still available. The Bee Gee would be a easy fix but I do not know how well it performs as a blade control. I do not know why 657bruce did not respond to your post, maybe try a private message? Let me know.
The 17A D7 used a larger hyd. tank than the 3T D7 and uses a "pooched-out" lower grill.
yeah thanks for the replys fellas seiscat had sent bruce a pm and he did reply and told me he used a D7 E nose cone and a beegee pump the nose cone was cut done around 3 inchs in the width.
So does any body no what volume of oil was used by the D7 E and do the rams off a D7 E have the relief valve inside them
thanks Paul
Please log in or create an account to join the conversation.
Wed, Feb 5, 2014 3:16 AM
seiscat
Offline
Send a private message to seiscat
Posts: 1,319
Thank you received: 1
Reply to mrsmackpaul:
yeah thanks for the replys fellas seiscat had sent bruce a pm and he did reply and told me he used a D7 E nose cone and a beegee pump the nose cone was cut done around 3 inchs in the width.
So does any body no what volume of oil was used by the D7 E and do the rams off a D7 E have the relief valve inside them
thanks Paul
Wow! I was fooled on this one! What got me thinking D6C was the rams not having a tube running the entire length of the top side of the ram which is the case on the D7E. Evidently 657bruce rolled the rams over to protect the tubes. Dang, that is embarrassing for someone that owns a hyd. blade D7E!
I have been looking at my hyd. controls parts book for my D7E and the specification for all arrangements is 54 U.S. gallons per minute. The pressure relief valve is mounted inside the hyd. tank.
The D7E used three hyd. controls the 171, 172 and 173. The 171 arrangement was run off the transmission pump and was intended to run a hyd. tilt cylinder on a cable blade machine. The 172 arrangement had a pump mounted on the accessory drive on the rear of the engine and the tank mounted on the floorboard to the operator's right. The 173 arrangement had the pump driven by the front of the crankshaft and the tank mounted behind the lower half of the radiator grill.
I hope this helps. I've got to go scrape all this egg off my face now.👍
Please log in or create an account to join the conversation.
Wed, Feb 5, 2014 5:25 AM
edb
Offline
Member
Send a private message to edb
Posts: 4,091
Thank you received: 27
Reply to seiscat:
Wow! I was fooled on this one! What got me thinking D6C was the rams not having a tube running the entire length of the top side of the ram which is the case on the D7E. Evidently 657bruce rolled the rams over to protect the tubes. Dang, that is embarrassing for someone that owns a hyd. blade D7E!
I have been looking at my hyd. controls parts book for my D7E and the specification for all arrangements is 54 U.S. gallons per minute. The pressure relief valve is mounted inside the hyd. tank.
The D7E used three hyd. controls the 171, 172 and 173. The 171 arrangement was run off the transmission pump and was intended to run a hyd. tilt cylinder on a cable blade machine. The 172 arrangement had a pump mounted on the accessory drive on the rear of the engine and the tank mounted on the floorboard to the operator's right. The 173 arrangement had the pump driven by the front of the crankshaft and the tank mounted behind the lower half of the radiator grill.
I hope this helps. I've got to go scrape all this egg off my face now.👍
Hi Paul,
the valves you show in the cyl rods are to relieve/bypass oil from one side of the piston to the other when the rod bottoms out in the cyl. It stops a hydralic pressure spike when the ram stops at the end of its travel.
The valves on the top of later Cat blade cylinders are Quick Drop Valves that allow the blade to return to the ground quicker than the the pump can supply oil--faster cycle times for increased production and less power consumed, heat generated etc.
The main relief valves are in the hydraulic tank on these units.
The larger cylinders use more flow less pressure for the same effect as the later small cylinders using less flow more pressure.
In early days the hydraulic components --pumps, lines, fittings, hoses, packings etc. -- were low teck and could not last with high pressures.
Cheers,
Eddie B.
Please log in or create an account to join the conversation.
Wed, Feb 5, 2014 6:23 AM
Old Magnet
Offline
Send a private message to Old Magnet
Posts: 16,757
Thank you received: 39
Reply to seiscat:
Wow! I was fooled on this one! What got me thinking D6C was the rams not having a tube running the entire length of the top side of the ram which is the case on the D7E. Evidently 657bruce rolled the rams over to protect the tubes. Dang, that is embarrassing for someone that owns a hyd. blade D7E!
I have been looking at my hyd. controls parts book for my D7E and the specification for all arrangements is 54 U.S. gallons per minute. The pressure relief valve is mounted inside the hyd. tank.
The D7E used three hyd. controls the 171, 172 and 173. The 171 arrangement was run off the transmission pump and was intended to run a hyd. tilt cylinder on a cable blade machine. The 172 arrangement had a pump mounted on the accessory drive on the rear of the engine and the tank mounted on the floorboard to the operator's right. The 173 arrangement had the pump driven by the front of the crankshaft and the tank mounted behind the lower half of the radiator grill.
I hope this helps. I've got to go scrape all this egg off my face now.👍
Gets messy,
Under the 172 & 173 hydraulic control there is a carry over of the front mounted pump/control S/N 48C at 100 gpm (#173 being similar to #46 hydraulic control) similar to the 100gpm unit used on the 3T and 17A.

The cylinders used prior to 47A3396 and 48A6393 are similar construction to the 3T & 17A with no quick drop valves in the cylinder head.

The no drop valve cylinders are 6" bore x 37.625 stroke part # 3J4783. These cylinders have the center mount trunions.

For comparison, the higher presure quick drop cylinders are 4.75 " diameter.
Please log in or create an account to join the conversation.
Wed, Feb 5, 2014 6:29 AM
seiscat
Offline
Send a private message to seiscat
Posts: 1,319
Thank you received: 1
Reply to Old Magnet:
Gets messy,
Under the 172 & 173 hydraulic control there is a carry over of the front mounted pump/control S/N 48C at 100 gpm (#173 being similar to #46 hydraulic control) similar to the 100gpm unit used on the 3T and 17A.

The cylinders used prior to 47A3396 and 48A6393 are similar construction to the 3T & 17A with no quick drop valves in the cylinder head.

The no drop valve cylinders are 6" bore x 37.625 stroke part # 3J4783. These cylinders have the center mount trunions.

For comparison, the higher presure quick drop cylinders are 4.75 " diameter.
I am looking at my Caterpillar hydraulic controls parts book for serial numbers 48C1-up, 24G1-up, 25G1-up, 65G1-up and 67G1- up and it lists all arrangements to be 54 U.S. gallons per minute except the 171 arrangement which received oil from the transmission pump to operate a hydraulic tilt cylinder on a cable blade machine at 17 U.S.gallons per minute. There is no arrangement listed which requires more than 54 U.S. gallons per minute.
The serial numbers listed by old magnet are the break between 160 and 180 hp machines and have nothing to do with quick-drop valves.
I have a high regard for your knowledge old magnet, but you are mistaken on this.
Please log in or create an account to join the conversation.
Wed, Feb 5, 2014 6:55 AM
Old Magnet
Offline
Send a private message to Old Magnet
Posts: 16,757
Thank you received: 39
Reply to seiscat:
I am looking at my Caterpillar hydraulic controls parts book for serial numbers 48C1-up, 24G1-up, 25G1-up, 65G1-up and 67G1- up and it lists all arrangements to be 54 U.S. gallons per minute except the 171 arrangement which received oil from the transmission pump to operate a hydraulic tilt cylinder on a cable blade machine at 17 U.S.gallons per minute. There is no arrangement listed which requires more than 54 U.S. gallons per minute.
The serial numbers listed by old magnet are the break between 160 and 180 hp machines and have nothing to do with quick-drop valves.
I have a high regard for your knowledge old magnet, but you are mistaken on this.
I have form #35279.
Look at the bottom of page #7, arrangement 2J5913 which is a 100 gpm unit that takes you to page #12 for the 48C control group.

Yes it is confusing as the listings start out with the 54 gpm units.

You have to go to form #UE035033 for the 7A, 7S, 7U Bulldozers to get the info on the cylinders. S/N's 72F1-up, 59F1-up, 42G1-up.
I can post if required.

I am not sure if those s/n breaks define whether or not the non quick drop cylinders extend past those numbers or not but they would be required to match the 48C hydraulic control.
Please log in or create an account to join the conversation.
Wed, Feb 5, 2014 7:07 AM
seiscat
Offline
Send a private message to seiscat
Posts: 1,319
Thank you received: 1
Reply to Old Magnet:
I have form #35279.
Look at the bottom of page #7, arrangement 2J5913 which is a 100 gpm unit that takes you to page #12 for the 48C control group.

Yes it is confusing as the listings start out with the 54 gpm units.

You have to go to form #UE035033 for the 7A, 7S, 7U Bulldozers to get the info on the cylinders. S/N's 72F1-up, 59F1-up, 42G1-up.
I can post if required.

I am not sure if those s/n breaks define whether or not the non quick drop cylinders extend past those numbers or not but they would be required to match the 48C hydraulic control.
I give up, how can I make so many mistakes so fast. I also have form 35279 and in my rush to show off my knowledge and resources I overlooked the bottom of page 7 which does indeed list a 100 U.S. gallon per minute arrangement.
My hat is in my hands old magnet and I hope you can forgive my arrogance.
Please log in or create an account to join the conversation.
Wed, Feb 5, 2014 7:26 AM
Old Magnet
Offline
Send a private message to Old Magnet
Posts: 16,757
Thank you received: 39
Reply to seiscat:
I give up, how can I make so many mistakes so fast. I also have form 35279 and in my rush to show off my knowledge and resources I overlooked the bottom of page 7 which does indeed list a 100 U.S. gallon per minute arrangement.
My hat is in my hands old magnet and I hope you can forgive my arrogance.
Not a problem, I won't tell you how long I had to rummage through my stuff to sort it out. It is confusing to say the least. Problem is I probably won't remember and have to go through it all again the next time some one asks.
Please log in or create an account to join the conversation.
Wed, Feb 5, 2014 7:33 AM
Showing 1 to 10 of 30 results
1
YouTube Video Placeholder

Follow Us on Social Media

Our channel highlights machines from the earliest Holt and Best track-type tractors, equipment from the start of Caterpillar in 1925, up to units built in the mid-1960s.

Upcoming Events

WARRACKNABEAL EASTER RALLY 2026

Chapter Nineteen

| Wheatlands Warracknabeal Agricultural Museum 34 Henty Highway, Warracknabeal 3393

Lake Goldsmith 127th Rally

Chapter Nineteen

| 1234 Carngham - Lake Goldsmith Road ​Lake Goldsmith VIC 3373

HIGRO JUBILEUMEDITIE!

| “De Domelaar” Gebr .V.d. Heiden Domelaarsweg 3 7475 MARKELO Netherlands

Chapter 2 AGM

Chapter Two

| Folds Farm, Godshillwood, Fordingbridge, Hampshire, SP6 2LU
View Calendar
ACMOC

Antique Caterpillar
Machinery Owners Club

1115 Madison St NE # 1117
Salem, OR 97301

[email protected]

Terms & Privacy
Website developed by AdCo

Testimonials

"I also joined a year ago. had been on here a couple of times as a non-member and found the info very helpful so I got a one year subscription (not very expensive at all) to try it out. I really like all the resources on here so I just got a three year. I think its a very small price for what you can get out of this site."
-Jason N

Join Today!