acmoc

ACMOC Membership Benefits

  • FREE quarterly magazine filled with content about antique Caterpillar machines
  • FREE classified listings
  • ACMOC store discounts and specials
  • Full Bulletin Board Access
    • Marketplace (For Sale/Wanted)
    • Technical Library
    • Post attachments

$44 /year ELECTRONIC

$60 /year USA

$77 /year International

C.B. Hay Bean harvesters PIC's

More
1 year 4 months ago #243227 by railforlife
Here are some pics of bean theshers C.B. Hay and a few Price even an old Ventura
The following user(s) said Thank You: gary in CA, steeltracs

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
1 year 4 months ago - 1 year 4 months ago #243231 by gary in CA
Thanks for the pictures.Brought back a lot of memories.We farmed about 1,200 acres of blackeyes and harvested them with a 1948 CB Hay with a 371 Jimmy
In the early years we put three four row Ventura planters together to make a 12 row planter.Sure wish I had some pictures of it.
We farmed rolling hills so we used sprinkler pipe for irrigation.Hand lines moved twice a day
Our tillage was all done with crawlers.Even pulled the harvester with a TD9 as wheel tractors then couldn't pull it up the hills.Sometimes if harvester was full it couldn't either.
One field we had was even steeper and sandy so we had to put our HD11 on it
Attachments:
Last edit: 1 year 4 months ago by gary in CA.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
1 year 4 months ago #243232 by railforlife
I am in the process of rebuilding my old pull type ventura planter into a 3 point setup. i have tries other planters but I always end up fixing that old Ventura and using it. it always gets a better germ rate and no dead spots than my john deer 71 setup.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
1 year 4 months ago #243233 by juiceman
Awesome photos. Thank you for sharing. Is the smaller one called the Junior? BIG BERTHA seemed to be the choice for many here in the Sutter Basin.
These photos have inspired me. Crockpot is coming out for some baby Limas, sliced linguisa, pork hocks, onion, garlic and tomato! JM
The following user(s) said Thank You: Kurt Bangert

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
1 year 4 months ago #243234 by railforlife
I have that exact harvester with a 471 on it sitting in lompoc. I cant afford to get it hauled all the way up here so I am buying another one closer. that 48 standard is in my opinion better than the Bertha, not as tall and easier to maneuver.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
1 year 4 months ago #243235 by railforlife
The smaller one is my 36, it was a 2 cylinder with the thresher on the opposite side as the newer machines it had a crossover belt that dumped the beans on top of a counter rotating set of choppers before the first cylindeer. it had an old 3 speed transmission you used to speed up or slow down the cylinders. it worked great but it finally had too many problems to fix and was cheaper to get another unit.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
1 year 4 months ago #243240 by 17AFarmer
Railforlife. While I agree the 48 standard are nice machines. The Big. Bertha solved some problems that the standards had, one was getting to the cylinders. Digging it out if it plugged! , I liked the straw rack and sand screen drive much better. better balanced , I liked having the shoe on the rear of the machine and not having the cross auger and the elevator to have to take it to the top shoe, I put 7 inch auger and speeded the elevator up to stop the plugging . The 18 bar front cylinder is nice! Plus they are a little wider. We had Cat 3160 engine and finally had to put in 2 7/16 shafts in the front cylinders to hold the power plus heavier cutter shafts. The 48 was a Good machine but could never equal a Bertha, as far as moving them the length and width is close to the same I could not see any difference, in California the Biggest DOG wins out and you have to drive accordingly even though you don’t like too. California drivers are not kind to people moving equipment as I said I took my half out of the middle if had too. IF enough beans were still being grown I would absolutely still be running a Machine the best times of my life I DO miss it . 17afarmer. Mike

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
1 year 4 months ago #243243 by railforlife
I just know when I move a newer Bertha with the dump bin, I have to remove the elevator to the cleaner or it is way over height even for the lowest of lowbeds, and the standards can go on a 18 1/2 "  deck height lowbed without taking anything apart. I have both and I like them both for different reasons, but I am hauling a standard up to my farm in Mendocino county so I dont have to mess with any disassembly. Plus one can almost get a standard given to them where a Bertha is still going for anywhere from 25k on up. I just gave a 47 standard to a friend to harvest beans in a remote location so he can leave it there and keep him from the hassle of taking his bertha out there. I think even a standard compared to anything else out on the market today is still far superior but I agree the Bertha was the best design. Ole Colin had a great idea never needed changing in 75 years. I wish Melo would reproduce some of them even a jr would be nice for a small operation.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
1 year 4 months ago #243259 by 17AFarmer
I never saw very many get hauled on a lowboy they tow pretty nice behind a truck

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
1 year 4 months ago #243262 by gary in CA
Reminds me of the time a friend pulled his bean harvester from Newman Ca to San Jose Ca by the airport.On 580 the harvester blew a tire.The CHP stopped to check on them and he asked the CHP to help them pull back on the freeway.The CHP laughed and told them you are bigger than them they will move over.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.187 seconds
Go to top